Goat Anti-ERCC1 Antibody

$423.00

SKU Unit Size Price

Select a unit size:


SKU: EB08190
Formulation
Supplied at 0.5 mg/ml in Tris saline, 0.02% sodium azide, pH7.3 with 0.5% bovine serum albumin.
Unit Size
100 µg
Storage Instructions
Aliquot and store at -20°C. Minimize freezing and thawing.
Synonym / Alias Names
excision repair protein|excision repair cross-complementing 1|UV20|COFS4|excision repair cross-complementing rodent repair deficiency, complementation group 1 (includes overlapping antisense sequence)|ERCC1
Usage Summary
Additional validation: This antibody has been successfully used in the following paper: Sikorski et al. (2018) PMID: 30377371.
Accession ID
NP_973730.1; NP_001974.1
Blocking Peptide
EBP08190
Immunogen
Peptide with sequence DPGKDKEGVPQPS-C, from the N Terminus of the protein sequence according to NP_973730.1; NP_001974.1.
Product Comments
This antibody is expected to recognise both reported isoforms (NP_973730.1 and NP_001974.1).
Peptide Sequence
DPGKDKEGVPQPS-C
Purification Method
Purified from goat serum by ammonium sulphate precipitation followed by antigen affinity chromatography using the immunizing peptide.
Shipping Instructions
Refrigerated
Predicted Species
Human
Reactive Species
Human
Human Gene ID
2067
Product Grade
ELISA Detection Limit
Antibody detection limit dilution 1:64000.
Western Blot
Approx 38kDa band observed in lysates of cell lines A431 and Kelly (calculated MW of 35.6kDa according to NP_973730.1). This molecular weight is routinely observed by other sources. Recommended concentration: 0.3-1µg/ml.
Application Type
Pep-ELISA, WB
Selected References
[{"pmid": 30377371, "intro": "This antibody has been successfully used in the following paper:", "title": "A high-throughput pipeline for validation of antibodies", "author": "Krzysztof Sikorski, Adi Mehta, Marit Inngjerdingen, Flourina Thakor, Simon Kling, Tomas Kalina, Tuula A. Nyman, Maria Ekman Stensland, Wei Zhou, Gustavo A. De Souza, Lars Holden, Jan Stuchly, Markus Templin and Fridtjof Lund-Johansen", "journal": "Nat Methods. 2018 Nov;15(11):909-912"}]